|
Post by sɐǝpı ɟo uoıʇɐɹǝpǝɟ on Sept 16, 2016 15:41:45 GMT
I find so much of his work too contrived, ersatz, fakey, false, rent paying. The grand costumes attempt to give it a depth it doesn't really possess, a faux intellectualism that appeals to pseuds. He smears, but halfheartedly, it doesn't feel genuine. I feel his zenith was his abstract work many years ago but, even the, it was slightly clumsy, didn't feel fully explored. I'm not looking to argue, or piss people off. Just thought I'd proffer a point of view... I could see that. some of his work blows me away, while others look pleasing but don't grab me
|
|