Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2016 18:44:45 GMT
@iggy wiggy no great edit same point all the way through. The decision is based on the European Human Rights Law.
|
|
|
|
Post by IggyWiggy on Apr 10, 2016 18:56:51 GMT
@iggy wiggy no great edit same point all the way through. The decision is based on the European Human Rights Law. I see. A little hard to follow, all rather muddled. I note you posted 'I'm out' earlier in the thread. I hope you realise the European Convention on Human Rights has been deliberately warped by those using it for their own means. It is wonderful to see you fighting for human rights, can we expect to see you supporting Ai Weiwei in his struggle against the Chinese overlords, or marching against the Chinese authorities' blatant disregard for human rights? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2016 19:31:41 GMT
deleted my response as your points like you are just sad!!
|
|
|
|
Post by IggyWiggy on Apr 10, 2016 20:06:37 GMT
deleted my response as your points like you are just sad!! Human rights for the Chinese is sad? |
|
|
|
Post by IggyWiggy on Apr 10, 2016 20:44:43 GMT
Name-calling? Is this the point where you normally appeal to 'mods' to close the thread down?
Oh the irony.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2016 2:28:21 GMT
@iggywiggy
I do not see the point of a daft argument with you on Chinese Human rights you have no idea on my beliefs on Chinese human rights or anything I have to do with them. You are more than welcome to imply I am anti Chinese human rights if that makes you happy feel free. It just highlights though both how little you know of me and also how little you know of life in China and the Chinese.
As say on this topic the law you all are going on about is part of the European Human rights law. Seems your the one unhappy with it rather than me.
also worth noting that the majority of these orders are not used for celebs in 2011 333 so called super injunctions included 264 protecting children and vulnerable adults. These include fine examples of the press not being allowed to publish an 8 year old boys suicide note that was revealed at an inquest to stop further distress to his mother.
Restrictions on the press wanting to report on the mentally ill, dying family members, stories not related to the original act that would reveal the where abouts of victims of domestic violence or people who have been raped. As said initially there is a consequence to changes in the law. Or are you saying celebraties because they have money should be excluded from the benefit of the law in which case who would you deprive next??
Err actually I have never asked a mod to close down a thread. Again you are ill informed and just another daft accusation based on nothing
|
|
